Vol. 39, issue 03, article # 6

Arshinov M. Yu., Belan B. D., Kolotkov G. A., Pestunov D. A., Fofonov A. V. Study of CO2 and CH4 fluxes from the water surface in the coastal zone of the Ob River. // Optika Atmosfery i Okeana. 2026. V. 39. No. 03. P. 223–228. DOI: 10.15372/AOO20260306 [in Russian].
Copy the reference to clipboard
Abstract:

River ecosystems are a key component of the global carbon cycle, facilitating the transformation, transport, and emission of carbon. They ensure the movement of organic matter from continents to ocean basins and actively exchange substantial volumes of CO2 and CH4 with the atmosphere, thus significantly contributing to Earth's climate regulation. This work presents results of field measurements of greenhouse gas fluxes (CH4 and CO2) at the “water – air” interface in the coastal zone of the Ob River (Western Siberia) in summer – autumn 2024 using an original mobile chamber system consisting of a floating chamber and a portable laser gas analyzer Picarro G4301. Gas flux calculations at the “water – air” interface for each measurement used the open-source FluxCalR package in RStudio. The river ecosystem in the area under study acts as a constant source of methane emission into the atmosphere, with the intensity ranging from 0.12 to 15.81 mg × m-2 × h-1 (median values). For carbon dioxide, a transition was observed from emission at the beginning of the season (maximal intensity of up to 217.31 mg × m-2 × h-1 in July) to sink in August–October. The results confirm the contribution of river systems, particularly of Siberian rivers, to the regional carbon budget and can be used to consider this contribution in climate models.

Keywords:

“water – atmosphere” gas flow, chamber method, methane, dioxide gas, greenhouse gas, freshwater carbon cycle

Figures:
References:

1. Hersbach H., Bell B., Berrisford P., Biavati G., Horányi A., Muñoz Sabater J., Nicolas J., Peubey C., Radu R., Rozum I., Schepers D., Simmons A., Soci C., Dee D., Thépaut J.-N. ERA5 Hourly Data on Single Levels from 1940 to Present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). 2023. DOI: 10.24381 /cds.adbb2d47.
2. Forster P.M., Smith C., Walsh T., Lamb W.F., Lamboll R., Hall Bradley, Hauser M., Ribes A., Rosen D., Gillett N.P., Palmer M.D., Rogelj J., von Schuckmann K., Trewin B., Allen M., Andrew R., Betts R.A., Borger A., Boyer T., Broersma J.A., Buontempo C., Burgess S., Cagnazzo C., Cheng L., Friedlingstein P., Gettelman A., Gütschow J., Ishii M., Jenkins S., Lan X., Morice C., Mühle J., Kadow C., Kennedy J. Killick R.E., Krummel P.B., Minx J.C., Myhre G., Naik V., Peters G.P., Pirani A., Pongratz J., Schleussner C.-F., Seneviratne S.I., Szopa S., Thorne P., Kovilakam M.V.M., Majamäki E., Jalkanen J.-P., van Marle M., Hoesly R.M., Rohde R., Schumacher D., van der Werf G., Vose R., Zickfeld K., Zhang X., Masson-Delmotte V., Zhai P. Indicators of global climate change 2023: Annual update of key indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence // Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 2024. V. 16, N 6. P. 2625–2658. DOI: 10.5194/essd-16-2625-2024.
3. Meinrat A., Jones C., Cox P. Strong present-day aerosol cooling implies a hot future // Nature. 2005. V. 435. P. 1187–1190. DOI: 10.1038/nature03671.
4. Metan i klimaticheskie izmeneniya: nauchnye problemy i tekhnologicheskie aspekty / pod red. akad. RAN V.G. Bondura, akad. RAN I.I. Mokhova, chl.-korr. RAN A.A. Makosko. M.: Rossiiskaya akademiya nauk, 2022. 387 p.
5. Seneviratne S.I., Zhang X., Adnan M., Badi W., Dereczynski C., Di Luca A., Ghosh S., Iskandar I., Kossin J., Lewis S., Otto F., Pinto I., Satoh M., Vicente-Serrano S.M., Wehner M., Zhou B. Weather and climate extreme events in a changing climate. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change / V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T.O. Waterfield, R.Yu. Yele-kçi, B. Zhou (eds.). Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2021. P. 1513–1766. DOI: 10.1017/9781009157896.013.
6. Rocher-Ros G., Stanley E.H., Loken L.C., Casson N.J., Raymond P.A., Liu S., Amatulli G., Sponseller R.A. Global methane emissions from rivers and streams // Nature. 2023. V. 621. P. 530–535. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06344-6.
7. Soued C., Bogard M.J., Finlay K., Bortolotti L.E., Leavitt P.R., Badiou P., Knox S.H., Jensen S., Mueller P., Lee S.C., Ng D., Wissel B., Ngai C.C., Page B., Kowal P. Salinity causes widespread restriction of methane emissions from small inland waters // Nat. Commun. 2024. V. 15. P. 717. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-44715-3.
8. Cole J.J., Prairie Y.T., Caraco N.F., McDowell W.H., Tranvik L.J., Striegl R.G., Duarte C.M., Kortelainen P., Downing J.A., Middelburg J.J. Plumbing the global carbon cycle: Integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget // Ecosystems. 2007. V. 10. P. 172–185. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-006-9013-8.
9. Raymond P., Hartmann J., Lauerwald R., Sobek S., McDonald C., Hoover M., Butman D., Striegl R., Mayorga E., Humborg C., Kortelainen P., Durr H., Meybeck M., Ciais P., Guth P. Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters // Nature. 2013. V. 503. P. 355–359. DOI: 10.1038/nature12760.
10. Goncharova O.Y., Timofeeva M.V., Matyshak G.V. Carbon dioxide in soil, ground and surface waters of the northern regions: Role, sources, test methods (a review) // Eurasian Soil Sc. 2023. V. 56. P. 278–293. DOI: 10.1134/S1064229322602414.
11. Walter Anthony K.M., Anthony P., Hasson N., Edgar C., Sivan O., Eliani-Russak E., Bergman O., Minsley B.J., James S.R., Pastick N.J., Kholodov A., Zimov S., Euskirchen E., Bret-Harte M.S., Grosse G., Langer M., Nitzbon J. Upland Yedoma taliks are an unpredicted source of atmospheric methane // Nat. Commun. 2024. V. 15. P. 6056. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50346-5.
12. Udodov P.A., Ermashova N.A., Rasskazov I.M., Nazarov A.D., Bykov V.G., Korobeinikova E.S. Podzemnye vody Tomskoi oblasti // Izv. TPU. 1975. V. 297. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/podzemnye-vody-tomskoy-oblasti (data obrashcheniya: 09.01.2025).
13. Zhao J. FluxCalR: A R package for calculating CO2 and CH4 fluxes from static chambers // J. Open Source Software. 2019. V. 4, N 43. Р. 1751. DOI: 10.21105/joss.01751.
14. Maier M., Weber T.K.D., Fiedler J., Fuß R., Glatzel S., Huth V., Jordan S., Jurasinski G., Kutzbach L., Schäfer K., Weymann D., Hagemann U. Introduction of a guideline for measurements of greenhouse gas fluxes from soils using non-steady-state chambers // J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2022. V. 185, N 4. P. 447–461.
15. Drake T.W., Raymond P.A., Spencer R.G.M. Terrestrial carbon inputs to inland waters: A current synthesis of estimates and uncertainty // Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 2018. V. 3. P. 132–142. DOI: 10.1002/lol2.10055.
16. Karol' I.L., Kiselev A.A. Atmosfernyj metan i global'nyj klimat // Priroda. 2004. N 7. P. 47–52.
17. Campeau A., Del Giorgio P.A. Patterns in CH4 and CO2 concentrations across boreal rivers: Major drivers and implications for fluvial greenhouse emissions under climate change scenarios // Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014. V. 4. P. 1075–1088. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12479.